Next: SRFI-4, Previous: SRFI-1, Up: SRFI Support [Contents][Index]
The following syntax can be obtained with
(use-modules (srfi srfi-2))
or alternatively
(use-modules (ice-9 and-let-star))
A combination of and and let*.
Each clause is evaluated in turn, and if #f is obtained
then evaluation stops and #f is returned. If all are
non-#f then body is evaluated and the last form gives the
return value, or if body is empty then the result is #t.
Each clause should be one of the following,
(symbol expr)Evaluate expr, check for #f, and bind it to symbol.
Like let*, that binding is available to subsequent clauses.
(expr)Evaluate expr and check for #f.
symbolGet the value bound to symbol and check for #f.
Notice that (expr) has an “extra” pair of parentheses, for
instance ((eq? x y)). One way to remember this is to imagine
the symbol in (symbol expr) is omitted.
and-let* is good for calculations where a #f value means
termination, but where a non-#f value is going to be needed in
subsequent expressions.
The following illustrates this, it returns text between brackets
‘[...]’ in a string, or #f if there are no such brackets
(ie. either string-index gives #f).
(define (extract-brackets str)
(and-let* ((start (string-index str #\[))
(end (string-index str #\] start)))
(substring str (1+ start) end)))
The following shows plain variables and expressions tested too.
diagnostic-levels is taken to be an alist associating a
diagnostic type with a level. str is printed only if the type
is known and its level is high enough.
(define (show-diagnostic type str)
(and-let* (want-diagnostics
(level (assq-ref diagnostic-levels type))
((>= level current-diagnostic-level)))
(display str)))
The advantage of and-let* is that an extended sequence of
expressions and tests doesn’t require lots of nesting as would arise
from separate and and let*, or from cond with
=>.
Next: SRFI-4, Previous: SRFI-1, Up: SRFI Support [Contents][Index]