It is occasionally useful to test a constraint from C code rather than
implicitly via the constraint string in a match_operand.  The
generated file tm_p.h declares a few interfaces for working
with constraints.  At present these are defined for all constraints
except g (which is equivalent to general_operand).
 
Some valid constraint names are not valid C identifiers, so there is a mangling scheme for referring to them from C. Constraint names that do not contain angle brackets or underscores are left unchanged. Underscores are doubled, each ‘<’ is replaced with ‘_l’, and each ‘>’ with ‘_g’. Here are some examples:
     | Original | Mangled | 
| x | x | 
| P42x | P42x | 
| P4_x | P4__x | 
| P4>x | P4_gx | 
| P4>> | P4_g_g | 
| P4_g> | P4__g_g | 
Throughout this section, the variable c is either a constraint
in the abstract sense, or a constant from enum constraint_num;
the variable m is a mangled constraint name (usually as part of
a larger identifier).
For each constraint except
g, there is a corresponding enumeration constant: ‘CONSTRAINT_’ plus the mangled name of the constraint. Functions that take anenum constraint_numas an argument expect one of these constants.
For each non-register constraint m except
g, there is one of these functions; it returnstrueif exp satisfies the constraint. These functions are only visible if rtl.h was included before tm_p.h.
Like the
satisfies_constraint_m functions, but the constraint to test is given as an argument, c. If c specifies a register constraint, this function will always returnfalse.
Returns the register class associated with c. If c is not a register constraint, or those registers are not available for the currently selected subtarget, returns
NO_REGS.
Here is an example use of satisfies_constraint_m.  In
peephole optimizations (see Peephole Definitions), operand
constraint strings are ignored, so if there are relevant constraints,
they must be tested in the C condition.  In the example, the
optimization is applied if operand 2 does not satisfy the
‘K’ constraint.  (This is a simplified version of a peephole
definition from the i386 machine description.)
     (define_peephole2
       [(match_scratch:SI 3 "r")
        (set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "")
             (mult:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "memory_operand" "")
                      (match_operand:SI 2 "immediate_operand" "")))]
     
       "!satisfies_constraint_K (operands[2])"
     
       [(set (match_dup 3) (match_dup 1))
        (set (match_dup 0) (mult:SI (match_dup 3) (match_dup 2)))]
     
       "")